Saving Stills From Lumix 6k Photo Mode For Mac
Saving Stills from Lumix 6K Photo Mode for Mac Today Gold Box deals at Amazon US, BHphoto, eBay, Amazon.de, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.fr, Amazon.it, Amazon.es. Panasonic Long-Range ToF Sensor Article ( Image Sensor World ).
Mad Max 4 - the tough, high-vibration, dirty action scenes were shot with OMD-EM1s - the rest with full MARKETING frame (FMF) cameras. Go to cinema and tell me where you can SEE the difference. (different story for stills where it is noticeable if the lens is sharp enough. Trouble is, you get LARGE lenses and 1 or 2 tiny bodies that require a ten minute menu fiddle to set the camera up. Portability was what MADE 35mm popular. That is lost with FMF equipment these days. MFT still has that portability factor.
Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development suggests that children move through four different stages of mental development. His theory focuses not only on understanding how children acquire knowledge, but also on understanding the nature of intelligence.
Did you ever see a phone maker say: 'WOW our phones are bigger and heavier this year'??? I mostly use GH4 for video shooting on a tripod, so I don't have IBIS at my most needed upgrades' list. Personally, I prioritize bigger sensor/low light performance the most and secondly getting rid off from the extra crop factor of x0.17 (which is x0.34 at M43 sensors) while shooting 4K video which makes a 12mm pana/oly lens 28mm equivalent, but not 24mm. Although now 4K will be XK etc. With GH5 but if Pana doesn't look for a Field of View equivalence with full frame standart image then I won't see any reason to upgrade GH4. Lastly like to say that I'm very negative about variable F factor lenses. GH4 still rocks but unfortunately, I'm almost sure that GH5 will just join to the party and won't put another LP to player (no better DPR score then GH4).
I hope that I got wrong impression what I read on GH5 so far. Uh, it's a 20mp sensor. Are you talking about when they try for 8K? Track master 2.0.1 for mac.
That'll be a lot bigger than 28mp, they'll need 44.2mp 4:3 ratio to cover 8K 16:9. The A7Rm2's FF sensor and canon's 50mp 5D are the smallest sensors currently with enough resolution to do 8K, assuming they could read it out fast enough in future versions. 20mp m43 is not diffraction limited at f2.8.
It's f5.6 to f8 mattering on what you call diffraction and the 'near as makes no difference' level isn't till f11. Now an 8K capable m43 sensor would be different but f2.8 would still be more than sufficient for it.
F4 m43 is only truly resolution limited at about 50mp. 6K 4:3 sensor needs 28MP else it cannot really do 6K.
3:2 6K sensor as seen in A6300 has 24MP for example. 4:3 is a bit closer to square hence 28MP 20MP m43 is limited visibly at f/5.6 the methematical treshold is closer to f/4. 16MP m43 is reaching actually past the limit at f/5.6, 24MP APS-C that is even a bit bigger pixel is too limited f/5.6.
28MP 6K m43 sensor like the one GH5 will have will hit diffraction limits well below f/4 PS This may be just fine for video since the 6K will be reduced to 4K and the diffraction will be avoided up to f/5.6 for most part. I doubt the sharpness will be anywhere near A6300 or A7r2 when they downsample from 6K or 15MP (2.5K??). 8K in m43 will be ridiculous. Best mx master settings for mac. It will soften way before f/2. Yeah I'd say there is not a chance of any very high bitrate ProRes type codec being recorded internally in the GH5. Does anyone know if a memory card similar to what we currently use in a GH4 is available that can even write at those kinds of bitrates?
And even if it could what would be the point if it would fill it up in a few minutes. Doubt I would use it myself. Would stick to a more compressed H265 type, or less compressed H264 as we do now. Not good if the H265 is even more difficult/slower to edit than H264. I hope this is not the case! @geogan As a rule of thumb: The more efficiently a format compresses (resulting in smaller files to save), the less efficiently it decompresses (for playing back the video clips). Thus, H.265 will need more ressources (faster computer) to play back (decompress) than H.264.
@DNature: 'about 1.6 hours on a 128GB card on UHD ProRes' I found this number as well here (see under specs!) But it does not mention whether it's for HD or UHD. It just says: 'Apple ProRes 422 HQ: 1.61 hours'. So I tried to find the data rate for ProRes HQ UHD and ended up on Apple's homepage: In the tabe below there is no UHD format, but there is Full HD (FHD) 1920 x 1080 with 29.97 fps in ProRes HQ: Data rate 220 Mbit/sec (220 Mbps).
Gh5 6k Photo Mode
-> continued below! Follow-up from above -> UHD is exactly 4x the size of FHD (pixel-wise), resulting in a data rate of 4x220 Mbit/s = 880 Mbit/s for ProRes HQ UHD with 29.97 fps. Now the calculation (giving a maximum result - in reality it may be a bit lower): 128 GByte (the size of the memory card) is 8x128 = 1024 Gbit. 1024 Gbit is 1'024'000 Megabit (calculated with 'times 1000' instead of 'times 1024'). 1'024'000 Megabit (size of the memory card) divided by 880 Megabit/sec (data rate for ProRes HQ UHD/29.97 fps) equals 1164 seconds = about ** 19.4 minutes (recording time for UHD) **. In Full HD it would be 4x as much: 77.6 minutes. In Full HD with 24 fps instead of 29.97 fps it would be 77.6 minutes / 24 * 29.97 which equals 96.9 Minutes, which is about 1.61 hours.